Descriptive Comparison of Clinical and Histological Characteristics Of Uterine Specimens With Radiological Findings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47489/szmc.v39i3.699Keywords:
Hysterectomy, Radiology, Histopathology, UterineAbstract
Background: Uterine diseases are typically classified as neoplastic or non-neoplastic. When untreatable, they necessitate hysterectomy, with radiological and pathological examinations ensuring accurate diagnosis and improved patient care.
Objective: To describe and compare the clinical and radiological characteristics of uterine specimens of hysterectomy patients with histopathological findings.
Method: This cross-sectional study was carried out at Rashid Latif Medical College and its affiliated Arif Memorial Trust Hospital, comprising 300 hysterectomy specimens collected over a two-year period. A non-probability consecutive sampling method was used. Following ethical approval, data was obtained from medical records and histopathology requisition forms using a structured proforma. Clinical, radiological, and histopathological parameters were analyzed with SPSS version 25. Categorical variables, including clinical presentation, radiological diagnosis, type of procedure, and histopathological findings, were summarized as frequencies and percentages, whereas continuous variables were expressed as mean, standard deviation, and range.
Results: A total of 300 hysterectomy specimens were analyzed. The most frequent clinical indications were abnormal uterine bleeding (30%) and heavy menstrual bleeding (30%). Fibroids (35%) and adenomyosis (16.3%) were the leading histopathological findings. On descriptive comparison, radiological diagnoses matched histopathological findings with the highest match seen in fibroids (90.5%) and uterovaginal prolapse (100%).
Conclusion: Most histopathological diagnoses of post-operative hysterectomy cases were aligned with the radiological diagnosis. However, histopathological examination continues to be the definitive standard for diagnosing and excluding malignancy and is required for all surgical specimens.
References
Kelleher AM, Demayo FJ, Spencer TE. Uterine Glands: Developmental Biology and Functional Roles in Pregnancy. Endocr Rev. 2019;40(5):1424–45. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00281
Gupta AK, Gupta I, Suri AK. Histopathological Spectrum of Hysterectomy Specimens. J Adv Med Med Res. 2020;32(6):96–104. https://doi.org/10.9734/jammr/2020/v32i630440
Marquardt RM, Kim TH, Shin JH, Jeong JW. Progesterone and estrogen signaling in the endometrium: What goes wrong in endometriosis? Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20153822
Kancharla DV, Sudhir DS. Adolescence and their recondite gynaecological issues. Int J Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;6(6):96–8. https://doi.org/10.33545/gynae.2022.v6.i6b.1236
Spaich S, Weiss C, Berlit S, Hornemann A, Sütterlin M. The hysterectomy: influence of the surgical method in benign disease on convalescence and quality of life. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023;307(3):797–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-022-06778-9
Arezzo F, Cormio G, La Forgia D, Kawosha AA, Mongelli M, Putino C, et al. The Application of Sonovaginography for Implementing Ultrasound Assessment of Endometriosis and Other Gynaecological Diseases. Diagnostics. 2022;12(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12040820
Ge Y, Yang S, Yu Y, Liu Y, Li R. Gynecopathology in the Diagnosis and Assessment of Chronic Endometritis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2023;50(5). https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ceog5005093
Scepanovic B, Andjelic N, Mladenovic-Segedi L, Kozic D, Vuleta D, Molnar U, et al. Diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating malignant from benign endometrial lesions. Front Oncol. 2023;13(April):1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1109495
Li S. Chapter 22. Ben Cao Gang Mu. 2019;1897:684–741.
Al-Taee RAM, Al-Aameli MH, Al-Qazwini YM. Histological Techniques: A brief Historical Overview. J Glob Sci Res. 2019;2(January):218–23. Available from: http://www.gsj-pub.com/jgsr
Soomro SB, Pirzada H, Zafar AF, Majeed M, Habib S. Indications and Histopathological Analysis of Hysterectomy Specimens. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(7):319–20. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22167319
Shahid R, Abbas H, Mumtaz S, Perveen F, Bari MF, Raja T, et al. Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy in Reproductive Age: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital. Cureus. 2020;12(5):e8344. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.8344
Shrestha D, Aryal S, Tiwari A, Sharma R. Abnormal Uterine Bleeding among Women Visiting Gynecology Out-patient Department of a Tertiary Care Hospital: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022;60(246):121–5. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.6954
Zehra T, Gardezi SAB, Shams M, Zareen S, Khurshid IK, Irshad Z. Frequency and Spectrum of Non-Malignant Lesions in Abdominal Hysterectomy Specimens. J Bahria Univ Med Dent Coll. 2021;11(3):116–20. https://doi.org/10.51985/ZZYV1850
Anshu, Gupta P, Singh T. The Concept of Self-Directed Learning: Implications for Practice in the Undergraduate Curriculum. Indian Pediatr. 2022;59(4):331–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13312-022-2501-x
Rawat N, Tignath A, Jain A, Soni S, Agrawal M. Histopathological spectrum of uterine lesions in hysterectomy specimens. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2022;6(May):11176–80. https://doi.org/10.53730/ijhs.v6nS6.13085
Mishra DA, Mishra DP, Kumar DBN, Pandey DT, Srivastava DS, Dwivedi DM. Histopathological spectrum of hysterectomy specimens and its correlation with clinical diagnosis at a tertiary care centre. Trop J Pathol Microbiol. 2019;5(4):240–7. https://doi.org/10.17511/jopm.2019.i04.10
Grigore M, Popovici R, Himiniuc L, Scripcariu I, Toma B, Grigore A, et al. The added value of three-dimensional ultrasonography in uterine pathology. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(5):1–6. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.10696
Shah SJH, Murrium SK-T-S, Naveed F, Fatima M, Gilani SA, Babar R. Comparative Study of Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography Vs Histopathology in patients Undergoing Hysterectomy due to Uterine Pathologies. Pakistan J Med Health Sci. 2022;16(3):184–7. https://doi.org/10.53350/pjmhs22163184
Kumari A, Pankaj S, Choudhary V, Kumari J, Nazneen S, Kumari A, et al. Ultrasonic and Histopathological Evaluation to Exclude Premalignant and Malignant Lesions in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women Presenting as Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. J Obstet Gynecol India. 2019;69(s2):171–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-018-1166-9
This work is licensed under a 