Stress Levels in Medical Students Studying in Conventional Versus Modular System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47489/szmc.v39i3.813Keywords:
stress, medical students, traditional system, modular systemAbstract
Background: Medical students have been reported to experience stress due to various factors, of which the system of education plays a major role.
Objective: To compare the stress levels in medical students studying in conventional/Conventional (Annual) and integrated modular system of medical education in medical colleges affiliated with a government sector university in Lahore.
Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted on medical students of five medical colleges in Lahore. Two classes, MBBS second and fourth years. The duration of study was from November 2024 to March 2025. Data was collected using the 2020 version of student stress inventory (SSI), and was analyzed using R-language version 4.5.2.
Results: Among the students from Conventional system, 33% (n=31) students experienced low; 54% (n=51) students experienced moderate; whereas 14% (n=13) students experienced severe academic stress. Among students from the modular system, 52% (n=49) students experienced low; 47% (n=45) students experienced moderate; and 1% (n=1) students experienced severe academic stress (p value <0.001). Whereas, among the Conventional system students; 46% (n=44) students experienced low; 42% (n=40) students experienced moderate; and 12% (n=11) students experienced severe overall stress. And among the modular system students; 63% (n=60) students experienced low; 37% (n=35) students experienced moderate; whereas 0% (n=0) students experienced severe overall stress (p value = 0.001).
Conclusion: Stress levels are higher in medical students studying in Conventional system, as compared to those studying in modular system, in medical colleges, affiliated with the UHS.
References
WHO, World Health Organization [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023 [cited: 2025 February 24]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/stress
Fink G. Stress: Concepts, definition and history. Change. 2016 Jan. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/George-Fink/publication/317026245_Stress_Concepts_Cognition_Emotion_and_Behavior_Handbook_of_Stress/links/59d17f1b0f7e9b4fd7fa28b3/Stress-Concepts-Cognition-Emotion-and-Behavior-Handbook-of-Stress.pdf
Al-Joubour ZT, AlRufaei IA, Al-Khazaali IA, Assi MA, Al-Fahham AA. Hormonal Changes During Acute Stress Response. International Journal Of Health & Medical Research. 2024;3(6):266-71. https://doi.org/10.58806/ijhmr.2024.v3i06n02
Mehboob B, Jehan AM, Rahim S, Khan N, Khattak HW, Raheem A, et al. Depression, anxiety, and stress among dental students studying in modular and Conventional curriculum. Journal of Khyber College of Dentistry. 2023 Dec 31;13(4):8-11. https://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v13i04.575
Kasarla RR, Verma A, Pathak L. Methodologies and models for integration of medical curriculum for effective teaching and learning: a theoretical review. Journal of Universal College of Medical Sciences. 2022 Aug 9;10(1):77-80. https://doi.org/10.3126/jucms.v10i01.47250
Ajmal A, Manzoor I. Shift of Conventional curriculum to integrated curriculum: a drastic step by University of Health Sciences (UHS), Lahore. JAMDC. 2023;5(1):1-3. https://doi.org/10.51127/JAMDCV5I1editorial
UHS, University of Health Sciences [Internet]. Lahore: University of Health Sciences; 2024 [cited: 2025 February 24]. Available from: https://www.uhs.edu.pk/downloads/2k23mbbscurriculumv20.pdf
Quintero GA, Vergel J, Arredondo M, Ariza MC, Gómez P, Pinzon-Barrios AM. Integrated medical curriculum: advantages and disadvantages. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2016;3:JMECD-S18920. http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/JMECD.S18920
Challa KT, Sayed A, Acharya Y. Modern techniques of teaching and learning in medical education: a descriptive literature review. MedEdPublish. 2021 Jan 21;10:18. https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2021.000018.1
Satpathy P, Siddiqui N, Parida D, Sutar R. Prevalence of stress, stressors, and coping strategies among medical undergraduate students in a medical college of Mumbai. Journal of Education and Health Promotion. 2021 Aug 31;10:318. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1395_20
FMHCMD [Internet]. Lahore: FMH College of Medicine and Dentistry; 2024 [cited: 2025 February 24]. Available from: https://www.fmhcmd.edu.pk/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Student-Handbook-2023-24_MBBS-BDS.pdf
Arip MA. STUDENT STRESS INVENTORY (SSI) Development, Validity and Reliability of Student Stress Inventory [Internet]. 2016.
Weber J, Skodda S, Muth T, Angerer P, Loerbroks A. Stressors and resources related to academic studies and improvements suggested by medical students: a qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. 2019 Aug 20;19(1):312. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1747-z
Ragab EA, Dafallah MA, Salih MH, Osman WN, Osman M, Miskeen E, Taha MH, Ramadan A, Ahmed M, Abdalla ME, Ahmed MH. Stress and its correlates among medical students in six medical colleges: an attempt to understand the current situation. Middle East Current Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 10;28(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-021-00158-w
Slimmen S, Timmermans O, Mikolajczak-Degrauwe K, Oenema A. How stress-related factors affect mental wellbeing of university students: A cross-sectional study to explore the associations between stressors, perceived stress, and mental wellbeing. PloS One. 2022 Nov 7;17(11):e0275925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0275925
ur Rahman I, Mansoor S, Meraj L, Ahmad M, Dodhy MA, Sattar H. Faculty Satisfaction Regarding Modular Teaching. Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College. 2022 Mar 31;26(1). https://doi.org/10.37939/jrmc.v26i1.1880
Almansour M, Almoayad F. Exploring challenges and perceptions in the learning environment: an online qualitative study of medical students. BMC Medical Education. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):147. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05116-8
Tariq M, Ikram A, Farooq M, et al. Qualitative Phenomenological Exploration of Perspective of Medical Students Regarding Integrated Modular System. Med Sci Educ. 2025;35:1605–1616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-025-02364-1
Kassem AH, Abo Habieb EE, El-Bastwese RM. Effect of Blended vs. Conventional Teaching Methods on Nursing Students Academic Stress and Their Achievement at Mansoura University. Egyptian Journal of Health Care. 2020 Jun 1;11(2):408–26. https://journals.ekb.eg/article_129135_084efbe8d5f185b5448205a44360c736.pdf
Wang Y. A comparative study on the effectiveness of Conventional and modern teaching methods. In Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICHESS 2022). 2022 Dec 30;Vol. 720:270-277. Paris: Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-89-3_32
Munawar F, Ahmed H, Munawar M. Determining the Perception of Medical Students Regarding the Advantages and Disadvantages of Integrated Modular System (IMS) at Central Park Medical College, Lahore: Medical Students' Perceptions of Integrated Modular System. Health Professions Educator Journal. 2025 Jun 30;8(1):22-5. https://journals.uol.edu.pk/medicaleducator/article/view/3149
Mehboob B, Jehan AM, Rahim S, Khan N, Khattak HW, Raheem A, Tahir H. Depression, anxiety, and stress among dental students studying in modular and Conventional curriculum. J Khyber Coll Dent. 2023 Dec 31;13(4):8–11. http://doi.org/10.33279/jkcd.v13i04.575
This work is licensed under a 