Biocompatibility and Cytotoxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives on Human Dental Pulp Cells: A Systematic Review of in Vitro Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47489/szmc.v40i3.964Keywords:
Biocompatible Material, Cytotoxicity Tests, Dental Bonding, Dental Pulp CellsAbstract
Background: Unpolymerized monomers released from resin-based universal dental adhesives may diffuse through dentinal tubules towards the pulp, and cell-culture studies suggest that some monomers can impair pulp-cell function. Previous systematic reviews have addressed resin composites or dental adhesives in general, often with mixed cell types; to our knowledge none has restricted its question to human dental pulp cells exposed to universal adhesives. How the in vitro effects of universal adhesives on human pulp cells compare between products and experimental conditions therefore remains unclear.
Objective: To systematically review in vitro studies reporting the effects of universal dental adhesives on human dental pulp cells, compared with untreated controls or other adhesives, on cell viability/metabolic activity, cell death and inflammatory mediators, and to describe how these outcomes varied with the experimental conditions reported.
Methods: PubMed, ScienceDirect and Google Scholar were last searched on for in vitro studies published between 1 January 2020 and 23rd April 2026. English-language, full-text studies using human dental pulp cells and universal adhesives were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Methodological quality and completeness of reporting were appraised with an author-developed six-domain checklist adapted from CONSORT items (not a validated risk-of-bias tool). We synthesized findings narratively; we did not conduct a meta-analysis or formal certainty-of-evidence grading. The review was reported according to PRISMA 2020. This review was not registered in PROSPERO or any other registry
Results: Seven in vitro studies were included (five used human dental pulp stem cells; two used human pulp cells). Viability or metabolic activity was assessed by MTT (five studies), WST-1 (one), trypan blue (one) and Live/Dead staining (one); flow cytometry was used in two. Exposure ranged from 24 hours to 7 days, and three studies assessed more than one time point. Three studies measured inflammatory mediators (ELISA, MAGPIX or qPCR). Results differed markedly between products and between studies. At 24 hours, metabolic activity was close to control for Single Bond Universal and Clearfil Universal Bond Quick but markedly reduced for OptiBond Universal, ZipBond Universal, Bond Force II and Futurabond DC. Cytokine changes were reported after ZipBond Universal (IL-1?, IL-6, TNF-? and IL-10 increased) and Single Bond Universal (IL-8 increased). Findings for isolated monomers depended on concentration and could not be generalized to commercial adhesives.
Conclusion: Across seven heterogeneous in vitro studies, universal adhesives affected human pulp cells differently by product, concentration, assay, and exposure time. These data do not identify compositional determinants of biocompatibility, do not allow products to be ranked, and are not evidence of clinical pulpal safety or harm. Standardized protocols and clinical studies are needed.
References
Moharamzadeh K, Brook IM, Van Noort R. Biocompatibility of resin-based dental materials. Materials (Basel). 2009;2(2):514-48. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma2020514.
Franca CM, de Souza Balbinot G, Cunha D, Saboia VD, Ferracane J, Bertassoni LE. In-vitro models of biocompatibility testing for restorative dental materials: from 2D cultures to organs on-a-chip. Acta Biomater. 2022;150:58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.07.060.
Brizuela M, Bordoni B. Anatomy, head and neck, dental pulp. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 Jan–. Updated 2025 Dec 9. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK537112/.
Caldas IP, Alves GG, Barbosa IB, Scelza P, de Noronha F, Scelza MZ. In vitro cytotoxicity of dental adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater. 2019;35(2):195-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.028.
Hamid A, Hume WR. The effect of dentine thickness on diffusion of resin monomers in vitro. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24(1):20-5. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00490.x.
Bouillaguet S. Biological risks of resin-based materials to the dentin-pulp complex. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15(1):47-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130401500105.
Bourgi R, Kharouf N, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Haikel Y, Hardan L. A literature review of adhesive systems in dentistry: key components and their clinical applications. Appl Sci. 2024;14(18):8111. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188111.
Breschi L, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Josic U, Mancuso E, Cadenaro M, et al. The evolution of adhesive dentistry: from etch-and-rinse to universal bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2025;41(2):141-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.11.011.
Ahmed MH, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Yao C, Matsukawa A, Yoshida Y, et al. Acrylamide monomers in universal adhesives. Dent Mater. 2023;39(3):246-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2023.01.003.
Delgado AH, Ahmed MH, Ferreira MN, Azul AM, Polido M, Yoshihara K, et al. Physico-chemical properties and performance of functional monomers used in contemporary dental adhesive technology. J Adhes Dent. 2025;27:175-93. https://doi.org/10.3290/j.jad.c_2297.
Almusa A, Delgado AH, Ashley P, Young AM. Determination of dental adhesive composition throughout solvent drying and polymerization using ATR-FTIR spectroscopy. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(22):3886. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223886.
Xu S, Chen L, Lin X, Yang X, He L, Yan S, et al. Resin monomers induce apoptosis of the pulp-dentin complex through the mitochondrial pathway. J Toxicol Sci. 2024;49(12):531-41. https://doi.org/10.2131/jts.49.531.
Lovász BV, Berta G, Lempel E, Sétáló G Jr, Vecsernyés M, Szalma J. TEGDMA (triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) induces both caspase-dependent and caspase-independent apoptotic pathways in pulp cells. Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(5):699. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050699.
Krifka S, Hiller KA, Spagnuolo G, Jewett A, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. The influence of glutathione on redox regulation by antioxidant proteins and apoptosis in macrophages exposed to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA). Biomaterials. 2012;33(21):5177-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.013.
Lima AF, Oliveira AA, Fronza BM, Braga RR, Andia DC. Toxicity and cytokine release from human dental pulp stem cells after exposure to universal dental adhesives cured by single peak and polywave LEDs. Dent Mater. 2024;40(5):837-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.03.004.
Ersöz B, Aydin N, Oktay EA, Çal ?K, Karao?lano?lu S. Effects of universal adhesives on dentin matrix proteins, matrix metalloproteinases and cytokine release of human pulp cells. Odontology. 2026;114(1):138-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-025-01107-3.
Javed K, Noor N, Nasir MZ, Manzoor MA. Comparison of postoperative hypersensitivity between total-etch and universal adhesive system: a randomized clinical trial. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):678. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-51175-8.
Fang K, Chen K, Shi M, Wang L. Effect of different adhesive systems on dental defects and sensitivity to teeth in composite resin restoration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(6):2495-511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-05007-0.
Polesso Patias M, Fernandes-e-Silva P, Carreño NL, Lund RG, Piva E, da Silva AF, et al. Comparative clinical performance of universal adhesives versus etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2025;29(7):352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-025-06427-w.
Wiertelak-Maka?a K, Szymczak-Pajor I, Bociong K, ?liwi?ska A. Considerations about cytotoxicity of resin-based composite dental materials: a systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(1):152. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010152.
de Lucena FS, Bronze-Uhle ÉS, Logan M, Lewis S, de Oliveira Gallinari M, Lisboa Filho PN, et al. Modification of a universal adhesive with CHX- or DOX-loaded TiO? nanotubes as an anti-MMP strategy. Dent Mater. 2026;42(3):460-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2025.11.006.
Monteiro D, Barbier M, Delgado AH, Gonçalves L, Chaves-Ferreira M, e Cruz JV, et al. A multifunctional dendrimer for BPA-free dental adhesives: polymerization behavior and cytotoxic profile of G-IEMA. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2025;143:104162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2025.104162.
Koruyucu M, Akay C, Solakoglu S, Gencay K. Investigation of the cytotoxic effect of current dentine bonding agents on human dental pulp cells. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):1207. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04985-1.
Kazak M, Sarialioglu Gungor A, Ozman Z, Donmez N. Comparative cell viability of dentin-bonding adhesive systems on human dental pulp stem cells: time-dependent analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):663. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04438-9.
Cavallaro-Mota FD, Esposo GN, Kury M, Fronza BM, Saraceni CH, Andia DC, et al. Assessment of 10-MDP and GPDM monomers on viability and inflammatory response in human dental pulp stem cells. Dent Mater. 2025;41(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2024.10.008.
Wawrzynkiewicz A, Rozpedek-Kaminska W, Galita G, Lukomska-Szymanska M, Lapinska B, Sokolowski J, et al. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three dental universal adhesives: an in vitro study. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(11):3950. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21113950.
Sürmelio?lu D, Hepokur C, Yavuz SA, Ayd?n U. Evaluation of the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of different universal adhesive systems. J Conserv Dent. 2020;23(4):384-9. https://doi.org/10.4103/JCD.JCD_376_20.
Jiao Y, Ma S, Wang Y, Li J, Shan L, Liu Q, et al. N-acetyl cysteine depletes reactive oxygen species and prevents dental monomer-induced intrinsic mitochondrial apoptosis in vitro in human dental pulp cells. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0147858. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147858.
Jiao Y, Niu T, Liu H, Tay FR, Chen JH. Protection against HEMA-induced mitochondrial injury in vitro by Nrf2 activation. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:3501059. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3501059.
Nocca G, Callà C, Martorana GE, Cicillini L, Rengo S, Lupi A, et al. Effects of dental methacrylates on oxygen consumption and redox status of human pulp cells. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:956579. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/956579.
Baldion PA, Velandia-Romero ML, Castellanos JE. Dental resin monomers induce early and potent oxidative damage on human odontoblast-like cells. Chem Biol Interact. 2021;333:109336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2020.109336.
Lee BS, Jan YD, Huang GS, Huang CH, Chou HY, Wang JS, et al. Effect of dentin bonding agent diffusing through dentin slices on the reactive oxygen species production and apoptosis of pulpal cells. J Formos Med Assoc. 2015;114(4):339-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2012.12.009.
Castro AS, Maran BM, Gutierrez MF, Chemin K, Mendez-Bauer ML, Bermúdez JP, et al. Effect of dentin moisture in posterior restorations performed with universal adhesive: a randomized clinical trial. Oper Dent. 2022;47(2):E91-105. https://doi.org/10.2341/20-215-C.
This work is licensed under a 